National Geographic has enthralled and
amazed readers since 1888 with its incredible, awe-inspiring photography. It
fascinatingly documents the growth, persistence, and abundance of life on
earth.
Has the online version of National
Geographic (“NatGeo” for short) lived up to the standard set by its print
version? Has it transitioned well onto
the internet? Well ...
Method of Evaluation
This blog provides a cursory review and analysis of the evolution of "NatGeo" online by quickly reviewing the
website's homepage at three different time points over the last seven
years. Utilized is an internet
time-portal called the Wayback Machine, available at http://archive.org/web/web.php.
Adopted here are three standards of judgment,
paraphrased, from Stephen Krugs' Don’t Make Me Think: A Common Sense
Approach to Web Usability. Good
webpage design involves three inter-related factors: elegance and ease of
design, approachability and intuitiveness of use, and simplicity and straightforwardness
of concept layout.
Evaluation
Utilizing the standards above, a
clear and steady progression of improved web design on the NatGeo website can
be seen by comparing its appearance on August 10, 2005; May 16, 2008; and August 28, 2012.
The most striking difference from ’05
to ’12 version initially is the vastly improved aesthetic. In ’05 the website had more words than photos
and the photos were small. In ’08 the
photos were slightly larger and more abundant but there’s still less imagery
than print. By ’12 the website has become
– like the print publication itself – a veritable feast for the eyes. There are numerous large photos accompanied
by terse captions, either of which may be clicked to see or learn more – a note
which leads to consideration of approachability and intuitiveness of design.
In '05 the website's homepage was
cluttered and cramped; much of the font was the same size and it is rendered
even more difficult to read because almost everything is underscored. Improvements marked the ’08 version wherein the
categories are more clearly delineated and various size fonts (which aren’t all
underscored) make it a little easier to scan and sift through the abundance of
text. The ’12 version is wonderfully
streamlined with well-demarcated sections containing a variety of font sizes
and colors, which helps the minimal amount of text to really pop on the
screen. Likewise, with each successive
version of the website the search box became more prominent and was rendered
more conspicuous, thereby contributing to the simplistic ease of browsing the ‘12
version.
Summary
In ’05 the site was cluttered with a haphazard
layout. By '08 it had been given a
sleeker presentation and been improved by a friendlier, more intuitive feel. By August of 2012 the site is sleek, elegant, and
wonderfully streamlined; it’s so simply arranged and neatly organized that
navigating through its content is gleefully intuitive.
National Geographic's legendary
photography, to those who’ve encountered its magazines, illumines and enlarges
our understanding of the earth we inhabit.
Its improved appearance on the web will assist in continuing that noble
endeavor.
How about a link to the website you reviewed? Dr. Cox
ReplyDelete